| From: | topmind(at)technologist(dot)com (Topmind) |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL |
| Date: | 2003-10-17 06:14:09 |
| Message-ID: | 4e705869.0310162214.386e9847@posting.google.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
seunosewa(at)inaira(dot)com (Seun Osewa) wrote in message news:<ba87a3cf(dot)0310031052(dot)77315052(at)posting(dot)google(dot)com>...
> Hi,
>
> This is for relational database theory experts on one hand and
> imlementers of real-world alications on the other hand. If there was
> a chance to start again and design SQL afresh, for best
> cleaness/power/performance what changes would you make? What would
> _your_ query language (and the underlying database concept) look like?
>
> Seun Osewa
> PS: I should want to post my ideas too for review but more
> experienced/qualified people should come first
Some ideas, links, and complaints about SQL and remaking
or replacing it:
http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?SqlFlaws
-T-
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2003-10-17 08:10:26 | Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-17 06:13:37 | Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection |