Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgpool

From: Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Geoffrey <lists(at)serioustechnology(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgpool
Date: 2010-06-29 13:27:37
Message-ID: 4c29f4cb.c84de70a.5898.7f19@mx.google.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 07:07:33AM -0400, Geoffrey wrote:
> A couple of questions regarding pgpool:
>
> Is there a problem with using multiple connection pools for the same  
> database?  Point being, we might want to give a higher number of  
> connections to one group of users then another.  I can see doing this by  
> having separate connection pools.  The higher priority users have a  
> larger connection pool.

That's entirely reasonable.

> Is there a problem with using connection pooling and traditional  
> connections to connect to the same database?

Nope.

--
Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
End Point Corporation
http://www.endpoint.com

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Joshua TolleyDate: 2010-06-29 13:37:36
Subject: Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
Previous:From: A. KretschmerDate: 2010-06-29 13:24:53
Subject: Re: alter table schema, default sequences stay the same

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group