Ahh.. It was correction of the test of often...
again, the pursued relation was seen, I think that it is good now.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp> writes:
>> [ examples_win32_patch2 ]
> Is the addition of -DFRONTEND actually needed, and if so why?
> We shouldn't be depending on that in any user-exposed code, I would
> think. Otherwise I don't have any objection to this version.
> regards, tom lane
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-12-30 16:51:10|
|Subject: Re: exec_execute_message crash |
|Previous:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2009-12-30 16:46:49|
|Subject: Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns|