Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Posix Shared Mem patch

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Date: 2012-06-26 21:18:38
Message-ID: 4FEA272E.4050503@agliodbs.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 6/26/12 2:13 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jun 26 15:49:59 -0400 2012:
>>> Robert, all:
>>>
>>> Last I checked, we had a reasonably acceptable patch to use mostly Posix
>>> Shared mem with a very small sysv ram partition.  Is there anything
>>> keeping this from going into 9.3?  It would eliminate a major
>>> configuration headache for our users.
>>
>> I don't think that patch was all that reasonable.  It needed work, and
>> in any case it needs a rebase because it was pretty old.
> 
> Yep, agreed.
> 
> I'd like to get this fixed too, but it hasn't made it up to the top of
> my list of things to worry about.

Was there a post-AgentM version of the patch, which incorporated the
small SySV RAM partition?  I'm not finding it.


-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-06-26 21:29:33
Subject: Re: proof concept - access to session variables on client side
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-06-26 21:17:12
Subject: Re: proof concept - access to session variables on client side

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group