Re: Naming conventions

From: Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Scott Briggs <scott(dot)br(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Naming conventions
Date: 2012-05-25 08:49:18
Message-ID: 4FBF478E.6010002@iol.ie
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 25/05/2012 02:21, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:08:03AM +0100, Raymond O'Donnell wrote:
>> On 15/05/2012 22:50, Scott Briggs wrote:
>>> So this is purely anecdotal but I'm curious, what's with all the
>>> different naming conventions? There's psql (for database
>>> connections), pgsql (used for some dirs like /usr/pgsql-9.1 and this
>>> mailing list), postgres (user and other references), and postgresql
>>> (startup scripts).
>
> Uh, the original Berkeley project name was postgres, pgsql is used as a
> short-hand for PostgreSQL, and psql is short for 'PostgreSQL SQL
> Monitor'.
>
>> ... and don't forget (maybe oddest of all) libpq! :-)
>
> libpq originally supported Postgres QUEL:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QUEL_query_languages
>

Good to know all this... it might be worth adding it to the website or
the wiki for the benefit of us blow-ins. :-)

Ray.

--
Raymond O'Donnell :: Galway :: Ireland
rod(at)iol(dot)ie

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2012-05-25 09:56:47 Usability write-up - looking at Pg, especially PgAdmin-III and Pg on Windows, from an inexperienced user PoV
Previous Message Karthik 2012-05-25 08:44:45 Re: Is there a way to start postgresql v907 as non daemon process