Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: proposal: additional error fields

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Peter Geoghegan" <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Noah Misch" <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: additional error fields
Date: 2012-05-02 14:51:41
Message-ID: 4FA103AD02000025000476E6@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>> That "F0" class looks suspicious; are those really defined by
>> standard or did we encroach on standard naming space with
>> PostgreSQL-specific values?
> 
> I think we screwed up on that :-(.  So we ought to renumber those
> codes anyway.  Perhaps use "PF" instead of "F0"?
 
Sounds good to me.
 
-Kevin

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-05-02 15:10:18
Subject: clog double-dip in heap_hot_search_buffer
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-05-02 14:23:17
Subject: Re: proposal: additional error fields

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group