Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>> That "F0" class looks suspicious; are those really defined by
>> standard or did we encroach on standard naming space with
>> PostgreSQL-specific values?
> I think we screwed up on that :-(. So we ought to renumber those
> codes anyway. Perhaps use "PF" instead of "F0"?
Sounds good to me.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-05-02 15:10:18|
|Subject: clog double-dip in heap_hot_search_buffer|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-05-02 14:23:17|
|Subject: Re: proposal: additional error fields |