On 4/25/12 6:16 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> The way standard-like temporary tables work is exactly why I assume
>> > Noah proposes to implement them: because they work nicely with HS.
> Well, following a standard that no other major DBMS has followed is
> not great, especially if it leads to a non-useful feature.
Actually, Oracle's temp tables are standard-compliant. You must explicitly define them via DDL and they remain in the catalog.
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2012-05-01 20:14:02|
|Subject: Re: proposal: additional error fields|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-05-01 20:09:17|
|Subject: Re: proposal: additional error fields |