Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Temporary tables under hot standby

From: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Temporary tables under hot standby
Date: 2012-05-01 20:12:20
Message-ID: 4FA043A4.5010608@nasby.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 4/25/12 6:16 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> The way standard-like temporary tables work is exactly why I assume
>> >  Noah proposes to implement them: because they work nicely with HS.

> Well, following a standard that no other major DBMS has followed is
> not great, especially if it leads to a non-useful feature.

Actually, Oracle's temp tables are standard-compliant. You must explicitly define them via DDL and they remain in the catalog.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect                   jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter GeogheganDate: 2012-05-01 20:14:02
Subject: Re: proposal: additional error fields
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-05-01 20:09:17
Subject: Re: proposal: additional error fields

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group