On 04/27/2012 11:33 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Well, they all sound similar. My info was that Mammoth was not WAL-based.
Mammoth was transaction log based but not WAL based.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andres Freund||Date: 2012-04-27 22:32:43|
|Subject: Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)|
|Previous:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2012-04-27 22:19:24|
|Subject: Re: xReader, double-effort|