Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Yeah, it would definitely be nicer if BEGIN; SET TRANSACTION LEVEL
> would work too. Maybe the place to put the check is where we
> establish the transaction snapshot.
That makes sense, and doesn't seem like it would be hard, from what
I recall of that code. I know I've fallen down on a couple other
things which I meant to look at lately, but this one should be small
enough to fit in between the brickbats the non-PostgreSQL world has
been throwing at me lately. I'll take a shot at it sometime today,
although it may be late.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-04-27 17:42:59|
|Subject: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown)|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2012-04-27 16:44:47|
|Subject: Re: enable_indexonly|