Uniform UPDATE queries

From: Dennis <dennis(dot)verbeek(at)victorem(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Uniform UPDATE queries
Date: 2012-04-18 10:11:54
Message-ID: 4F8E936A.9050303@victorem.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

When a query is written to update a table, the usual process is to list all the columns that need
updating. This could imply the creation of many possible queries for many columns. In an effort to
keep the UPDATE queries more uniform, less number of unique queries, a keyword similar to DEFAULT,
let's say CURRENT, is required to indicate that the current value must not change.

Examples:

update mytable set ( d ) = ("newvalue")

This is the usual way to change values in column "d" and requires writing a new query for updating
every column.

update mytable set ( a, b, c, d ) = ( a, b, c, "newvalue" )

This sort of works to change only column "d", but requires explicit naming of the columns on the
value side.

My suggestion is to introduce the CURRENT keyword:

update mytable set ( a, b, c, d ) = ( CURRENT, CURRENT, CURRENT, "newvalue" )

This could then lead to the uniform prepared JDBC statement:

update mytable set ( a, b, c, d ) = ( ?, ?, ?, ? ) where id = ( ? );

And then the JDBC driver could be improved to accept stmt.setString( 4, "newvalue" ) and
automagically substitute the first three parameters with CURRENT when the query is executed. Note
the added WHERE clause? The parameter for id is always on the same index. This makes the bookkeeping
a lot easier and should reduce the need for generating UPDATE queries or even client JDBC code.

-- Dennis Verbeek

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Sargent 2012-04-18 15:10:43 Re: Uniform UPDATE queries
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2012-04-16 14:30:32 Re: ERROR: operator does not exist: integer = integer[]