Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: documentation bug - missing info about unpackaged control files for extension
Date: 2012-04-15 14:32:25
Message-ID: 4F8ADBF9.2030606@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 15.04.2012 13:47, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> is somewhere documented sense of foo--unpackaged--version.sql files?

See section 35.15.4. Extension Updates, paragraph starting with "The 
update mechanism can be used to solve an important special case: 
converting a "loose" collection of objects into an extension."

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-04-15 15:21:22
Subject: Re: query planner does not canonicalize infix operators
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2012-04-15 12:58:55
Subject: Re: Last gasp

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group