Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Recovery mode for a WAL-based slave

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Wells Oliver" <wellsoliver(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recovery mode for a WAL-based slave
Date: 2012-04-11 17:24:32
Message-ID: 4F8578000200002500046DE1@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
Wells Oliver <wellsoliver(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
 
> Looking at PGAdmin, "in recovery?" is "yes", but replay location
> is the same as receive location, and the data is absolutely up to
> date.
> 
> Is the recovery bit an issue, or just SOP?
 
SOP.  It's due to the gradual evolution of the hot standby feature
from the transaction logs which were originally used just for crash
recovery.
 
-Kevin

In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Wells OliverDate: 2012-04-11 22:20:34
Subject: Definitive logrotate solution?
Previous:From: Wells OliverDate: 2012-04-11 17:17:54
Subject: Recovery mode for a WAL-based slave

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group