Re: [HACKERS] Regarding GSoc Application

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Regarding GSoc Application
Date: 2012-04-11 04:29:58
Message-ID: 4F8508C6.5090305@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On 04/10/12 8:41 PM, Atri Sharma wrote:
> I agree,the only need of Pl/Java that is apparent here is the need of the
> Java internals(JDK et al).If we set them up independently,then,we can have
> the FDW wrapping JDBC directly through JNI.JNI would call pure Java
> functions to connect to the JDBC.

PL/Java also provides for passing SQL arguments in various data types
to/from your java code. not usinig pl/java would mean you'd have to
reinvent all those wheels, they exist now in a standard mannner, why not
use them?

as I see it, your proposal could be implemented as a set of pljava
functions callable from SQL that would in turn invoke JDBC to connect to
and fetch data from your foreign database, then return it to the calling
SQL procedure, much as dblink does now for pg to pg database links.

--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Atri Sharma 2012-04-11 04:36:40 Re: [HACKERS] Regarding GSoc Application
Previous Message Atri Sharma 2012-04-11 03:41:10 Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Atri Sharma 2012-04-11 04:36:40 Re: [HACKERS] Regarding GSoc Application
Previous Message Atri Sharma 2012-04-11 03:41:10 Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application