| From: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead |
| Date: | 2012-04-10 15:36:25 |
| Message-ID: | 4F845379.9000703@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2012-04-10 17:34 keltezéssel, Michael Meskes írta:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> OK. Next question: now that both patches are intended to be applied,
>> should I send a unified single patch that contains the previous functionality
>> and the required fixes or a new one that only contains the last required fixes?
> I'm fine with whatever is easier for you.
>
> Michael
I guess the second option is easier for all of us because
reviewing it doesn't invalidate the previous ones.
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig& Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-10 15:36:38 | Re: [JDBC] Regarding GSoc Application |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2012-04-10 15:34:27 | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead |