Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andy <angelflow(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Ofer Israeli <oferi(at)checkpoint(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback
Date: 2012-04-02 01:11:03
Message-ID: 4F78FCA7.8010307@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 04/01/2012 08:29 PM, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>  wrote:
>>> You could try using Unix domain socket and see if the performance
>>> improves. A relevant link:
>>
>> He said Windows. There are no Unix domain sockets on Windows. (And please
>> don't top-post)
> Windows supports named pipes, which are functionally similar, but I
> don't think pg supports them.
>

Correct, so telling the OP to have a look at them isn't at all helpful. 
And they are not supported on all Windows platforms we support either 
(specifically not on XP, AIUI).

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Віталій ТимчишинDate: 2012-04-02 07:14:01
Subject: Re: database slowdown while a lot of inserts occur
Previous:From: Claudio FreireDate: 2012-04-02 00:29:35
Subject: Re: TCP Overhead on Local Loopback

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group