From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robert(dot)haas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve the -l (limit) option recently added to contrib/vacuumlo |
Date: | 2012-03-21 07:10:28 |
Message-ID: | 4F697EE4.6090308@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 21.03.2012 01:05, Tom Lane wrote:
> Improve the -l (limit) option recently added to contrib/vacuumlo.
>
> Instead of just stopping after removing an arbitrary subset of orphaned
> large objects, commit and start a new transaction after each -l objects.
> This is just as effective as the original patch at limiting the number of
> locks used, and it doesn't require doing the OID collection process
> repeatedly to get everything. Since the option no longer changes the
> fundamental behavior of vacuumlo, and it avoids a known server-side
> limitation, enable it by default (with a default limit of 1000 LOs per
> transaction).
>
> In passing, be more careful about properly quoting the names of tables
> and fields, and do some other cosmetic cleanup.
Shouldn't this be backported? Without it, vacuumlo is effectively broken
in 9.0 and 9.1.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-03-21 13:54:53 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve the -l (limit) option recently added to contrib/vacuumlo |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-03-21 01:26:54 | pgsql: Add some CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() calls to the heap-sort call path |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-03-21 07:11:40 | Re: Chronic performance issue with Replication Failover and FSM. |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2012-03-21 06:43:14 | Reconstructing Insert queries with indirection |