Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date: 2012-03-01 17:42:43
Message-ID: 4F4FB513.40405@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>> And how would a DBA know that?
>
> We'd add a column to pg_class that tracks which page version is in use
> for each relation.

So a relation can't have some pages in Version 9.2, and other pages in
version 9.3? How will this work for 2TB tables?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-03-01 18:28:52 Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-03-01 17:19:54 Re: incompatible pointer types with newer zlib