On 29-02-2012 14:20, Thom Brown wrote:
> No, the cascade part is fine. It's the objects which won't cause a
> cascade that are an issue. Putting it in a transaction for rolling
> back doesn't help find out what it intends to drop.
DROP OWNED BY foo VERBOSE?
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Thom Brown||Date: 2012-02-29 18:23:29|
|Subject: Re: LIST OWNED BY...|
|Previous:||From: Christopher Browne||Date: 2012-02-29 18:14:04|
|Subject: Re: COPY with hints, rebirth|