Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: LIST OWNED BY...

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LIST OWNED BY...
Date: 2012-02-29 18:15:53
Message-ID: 4F4E6B59.6040903@timbira.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 29-02-2012 14:20, Thom Brown wrote:
> No, the cascade part is fine.  It's the objects which won't cause a
> cascade that are an issue.  Putting it in a transaction for rolling
> back doesn't help find out what it intends to drop.
> 
DROP OWNED BY foo VERBOSE?


-- 
   Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira       http://www.timbira.com.br/
   PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thom BrownDate: 2012-02-29 18:23:29
Subject: Re: LIST OWNED BY...
Previous:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2012-02-29 18:14:04
Subject: Re: COPY with hints, rebirth

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group