On 29-02-2012 14:20, Thom Brown wrote:
> No, the cascade part is fine.  It's the objects which won't cause a
> cascade that are an issue.  Putting it in a transaction for rolling
> back doesn't help find out what it intends to drop.
> 
DROP OWNED BY foo VERBOSE?


-- 
   Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira       http://www.timbira.com.br/
   PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

• Re: LIST OWNED BY... at 2012-02-29 17:20:52 from Thom Brown

Responses

• Re: LIST OWNED BY... at 2012-02-29 18:23:29 from Thom Brown

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Thom Brown	Date: 2012-02-29 18:23:29
	Subject: Re: LIST OWNED BY...
Previous:	From: Christopher Browne	Date: 2012-02-29 18:14:04
	Subject: Re: COPY with hints, rebirth