Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 23.02.2012 01:36, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 19:32 -0500, Dan Ports wrote:
 
>>> Hmm, it occurs to me if we have to abort a transaction due to
>>> serialization failure involving a prepared transaction, we might
>>> want to include the prepared transaction's gid in the errdetail.
>>
>> I like this idea.
> 
> +1. Anyone want to put together a patch?
 
Unless Dan claims it before I start the work, I'll do it.
 
-Kevin

In response to

• Re: SSI rw-conflicts and 2PC at 2012-02-29 13:56:43 from Heikki Linnakangas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2012-02-29 15:01:37
	Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Previous:	From: Heikki Linnakangas	Date: 2012-02-29 14:40:11
	Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2