Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Having a problem with RoR-3.1.1 and Pg-9.1

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Having a problem with RoR-3.1.1 and Pg-9.1
Date: 2012-02-28 17:52:04
Message-ID: 4F4D1444.5060807@gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
On 02/28/2012 09:50 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>
> Sigh.  I will have to think on this before changing anything.
>
> To my mind, the most straight-forward way of dealing with
> this is to remove the language from template1 altogether.
> Thereafter, the db owner must explicitly add it back in
> where required.  So, the default would be no extension.

Well that is how it was prior to 9.0.


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-02-28 17:58:02
Subject: Re: pg_class.relnamespace NOT IN pg_namespace.oid
Previous:From: James B. ByrneDate: 2012-02-28 17:50:28
Subject: Re: Having a problem with RoR-3.1.1 and Pg-9.1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group