Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost
Date: 2012-02-22 04:27:58
Message-ID: 4F446ECE.3070004@2ndQuadrant.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 02/21/2012 04:44 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> The solution would be to be able to create hstore 1.1 from 1.0
> automatically and I sent over a very simple patch to do that, albeit
> after the deadline for the current CF (that's why it's not listed).
>
> Maybe that's simple enough to be considered? (re-attaching here)

I can't find any message that matches this description--from you, 
touches extensions in this way, and was submitted after the CF 
deadline.  Help?  If that's something that ripples out to impacting how 
changes to upgraded extensions should look, that should get its own 
thread I think.  This one is pretty deep and already far off its titled 
topic.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2012-02-22 04:55:06
Subject: Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost
Previous:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2012-02-22 01:34:01
Subject: Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group