From: | Federico Di Gregorio <fog(at)dndg(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Psycopg2 and LIXA |
Date: | 2012-02-13 09:17:24 |
Message-ID: | 4F38D524.7040107@dndg.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | psycopg |
On 13/02/12 10:10, Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
> I assume the function should be called with a Python interpreter well
> initialized, but if lixa is imported by a Python process and the above
> code is called by a function wrapped in a Python call I assume all the
> conditions required are met. Of course everything is pretty
> experimental: psycopg doesn't offer (yet) a C api, nor the import
> file are designed to be used outside the library: if the approach
> works we can provide a Python C API properly done.
That's what I was thinking too but then psycopg users will lose custom
connection (and cursor) objects. :/ IMHO the best approach would be for
LIXA to extend its concept of "profile" to include connection factories
and let Python code to register custom profiles and connection
factories. I understand that is probably alien to what LIXA does now but
would increase acceptance by Pythonistas.
federico
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christian Ferrari | 2012-02-13 21:50:18 | Re: Psycopg2 and LIXA |
Previous Message | Daniele Varrazzo | 2012-02-13 09:10:33 | Re: Psycopg2 and LIXA |