Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time

From: Jay Levitt <jay(dot)levitt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jim \"Decibel!\" Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time
Date: 2012-02-07 19:39:07
Message-ID: 4F317DDB.5070907@gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jim "Decibel!" Nasby wrote:
> I agree that it's probably pretty unusual to index floats.

FWIW: Cubes and points are floats, right? So would spatial indexes benefit 
from this optimization, or is it only raw floats?

Jay Levitt

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2012-02-07 19:45:10
Subject: Re: When do we lose column names?
Previous:From: Jay LevittDate: 2012-02-07 19:28:11
Subject: Re: Bugs/slowness inserting and indexing cubes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group