Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup()

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch pg_is_in_backup()
Date: 2012-02-03 02:31:43
Message-ID: 4F2B470F.5070107@timbira.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 02-02-2012 20:06, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> If there is more than one concurrent backup running, which one do you
> return? The first one or the latest one? Or perhaps you need an
> interface thta can return them all...
> 
IMHO, pg_is_in_backup() should return true if one or more backup copies are
running. As about returning the backup timestamp, we could return an array
like array[['label_1', '2012-01-28 02:00:01 BRST'], ['label_2', '2012-01-28
03:40:34 BRST']] or NULL if none.


-- 
   Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira       http://www.timbira.com.br/
   PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHIDate: 2012-02-03 04:01:11
Subject: Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage
Previous:From: Joachim WielandDate: 2012-02-03 01:31:48
Subject: Re: patch for parallel pg_dump

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group