On 27.01.2012 15:38, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> Yeah, we have to be careful with any overhead in there, it can be a hot
>> spot. I wouldn't expect any measurable difference from the above, though.
>> Could I ask you to rerun the pgbench tests you did recently with this patch?
>> Or can you think of a better test for this?
> I can't do so immediately, because I'm waiting for Nate Boley to tell
> me I can go ahead and start testing on that machine again. But I will
> do it once I get the word.
I committed this. I ran pgbench test on an 8-core box and didn't see any
slowdown. It would still be good if you get a chance to rerun the bigger
test, but I feel confident that there's no measurable slowdown.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-01-30 15:03:09|
|Subject: Re: Multithread Query Planner|
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2012-01-30 14:55:07|
|Subject: pgsql: Make group commit more effective.|