Em 13-01-2012 17:05, Josh Berkus escreveu:
> On 1/13/12 2:44 AM, alexandre - aldeia digital wrote:
>>> Also, (2) only really works if you're going to obsolesce (remove)
>>> archive records after a certain period of time. Otherwise the
>>> sub-partitioning hurts performance.
>> Is there any moves to include the "easy" table partitioning in the 9.2
>> version ?
> Nobody has been submitting patches.
I'm sorry hear this. Table partitioning is a very good helper in a large
number of performance issues. If there was a bounty to help anyone to
make this, I would be a happy contributor. :)
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: alexandre - aldeia digital||Date: 2012-01-23 17:26:47|
|Subject: Re: Discovering the most searched values for a field|
|Previous:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2012-01-23 17:03:17|
|Subject: Re: spikes in pgbench read-only results|