Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)
Date: 2012-01-19 19:10:00
Message-ID: 4F186A88.5060903@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/19/2012 01:41 PM, Alex Shulgin wrote:
>
> With the proposed approach it would only take me to include
>
> @fest comment "Patch applies cleanly"
>
> and possibly
>
> @fest status Needs Review
>
> to update the patch status and that'd be it.
>

It will be easy if you get it right. My point was that it's way too easy 
to get it wrong.

cheers

andrew

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2012-01-19 19:15:12
Subject: Re: Vacuum rate limit in KBps
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2012-01-19 19:05:36
Subject: Re: Vacuum rate limit in KBps

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group