> I mean, is email arcane? Surely not. Are summary lines arcane? Give
> me a break. So the only real complain point here is message-id, which
> normally people don't care about and don't even know they exist. So
> they have to learn about it.
The complaint is that the reviewer is expected to use two different and
wholly incompatible methods of communication, each of which requires a
separate registration, to post the review.
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2012-01-16 21:30:51|
|Subject: Re: SKIP LOCKED DATA|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2012-01-16 21:10:23|
|Subject: Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)|