Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: xlog location arithmetic

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: xlog location arithmetic
Date: 2012-01-15 01:18:31
Message-ID: 4F122967.6070400@2ndQuadrant.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 01/14/2012 09:12 AM, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> But I must adjust the patch based on the thread comments (basically,
> numeric output). I have a new patch but need to test it before submitting it.
> I'll post this weekend.

It's now at https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=776 
listed as waiting on you right now.  It's good to put patches into the 
CF application early.  Helps planning, and gives a safety net against 
all sorts of things.  We wouldn't want something this obviously useful 
to get kicked out if, for example, you lost your Internet connection 
over the weekend and then didn't technically qualify as having submitted 
it there before the deadline.  As someone who sweated today for two 
hours when my power at home was turned off to install a new circuit 
breaker, I'm feeling particularly paranoid right now about that sort of 
thing here.

The fact that you got some review feedback before the official CF start 
doesn't mean you can't be listed there right now.  In fact, those are 
things I like to see tracked.  Having links to all of the e-mail 
messages that were important turning points for a feature that changed 
during review is very helpful to reviewers and committers.  And the 
easiest way to keep up with that is to start as early as possible:  add 
it to the app right after the first patch submission.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2012-01-15 01:58:11
Subject: Re: Why is CF 2011-11 still listed as "In Progress"?
Previous:From: Mike LewisDate: 2012-01-15 00:49:31
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group