Re: Partitioning by status?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partitioning by status?
Date: 2012-01-13 19:05:56
Message-ID: 4F108094.4070401@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 1/13/12 2:44 AM, alexandre - aldeia digital wrote:
>>
>> Also, (2) only really works if you're going to obsolesce (remove)
>> archive records after a certain period of time. Otherwise the
>> sub-partitioning hurts performance.
>>
>
> Is there any moves to include the "easy" table partitioning in the 9.2
> version ?

Nobody has been submitting patches.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2012-01-13 19:08:18 Re: Discovering the most searched values for a field
Previous Message alexandre - aldeia digital 2012-01-13 18:08:59 Discovering the most searched values for a field