On 1/13/12 2:44 AM, alexandre - aldeia digital wrote:
>> Also, (2) only really works if you're going to obsolesce (remove)
>> archive records after a certain period of time. Otherwise the
>> sub-partitioning hurts performance.
> Is there any moves to include the "easy" table partitioning in the 9.2
> version ?
Nobody has been submitting patches.
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2012-01-13 19:08:18|
|Subject: Re: Discovering the most searched values for a field|
|Previous:||From: alexandre - aldeia digital||Date: 2012-01-13 18:08:59|
|Subject: Discovering the most searched values for a field|