On 12/23/2011 10:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> At this point, my question is: do we want to support the lsn data type idea or
>>> a basic function that implements the difference between LSNs?
>> Personally I think a function is enough - it solves the only case that
>> I've actually seen. But a datatype would be a more complete solution,
>> of course - but it seems a bit of an overkill to me. Not really sure
>> which way we should go - I was hoping somebody else would comment as
> I too think a datatype is overkill, if we're only planning on providing
> one function. Just emit the values as numeric and have done.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-12-23 15:14:41|
|Subject: Re: WIP: explain analyze with 'rows' but not timing |
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-12-23 15:13:41|
|Subject: Re: xlog location arithmetic|