| From: | Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Sylvain Mougenot <smougenot(at)sqli(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [SQL] JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this? |
| Date: | 2011-12-16 03:57:14 |
| Message-ID: | 4EEAC19A.30806@ringerc.id.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-sql |
On 15/12/2011 10:17 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Craig,
>
> That is the current implementation. What do you suggest as a more
> robust implementation ?
A java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/package-summary.html
See discussion:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8514725/obtaining-a-java-util-timer-or-equivalent-in-a-javaee-friendly-way-that-works-on
I'd just skip building statementTimeout support for the JDBC3 driver,
avoiding the issue with the JDK 1.5 requirement that way.
--
Craig Ringer
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Schmieta | 2011-12-16 18:57:32 | Re: Publish 9.1-901 JDBC drivers on maven central |
| Previous Message | Radosław Smogura | 2011-12-15 20:49:02 | Re: Re: [SQL] JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Fabiani | 2011-12-16 04:16:27 | using a generated series in function |
| Previous Message | Radosław Smogura | 2011-12-15 20:49:02 | Re: Re: [SQL] JDBC Statement.setQueryTimeout : is there plan to implement this? |