On 12/14/2011 06:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 12/14/2011 06:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> BTW, just to remind everybody: 8.2 is not live anymore.
>> I thought it was live to the end of this month. Didn't previous
>> discussion say that we'd go to the end of the stated month?
> Well, when we decided to make a release in December, we decided that
> was long enough for 8.2. I suggested that back here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-11/msg00578.php
> and nobody complained, nor for the more official statement here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-11/msg01087.php
> Also, all the public announcements about 8.2.23 have made it quite clear
> that this was the end of the line for 8.2, eg here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-announce/2011-12/msg00000.php
Well, I was going by
<http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-09/msg00952.php>,
which was less than 3 months ago.
But I'll stop now. :-)
cheers
andrew
In response to
pgsql-committers by date
| Next: | From: Peter Eisentraut | Date: 2011-12-15 14:55:34 |
| Subject: pgsql: PL/Python: Refactor subtransaction handling |
| Previous: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2011-12-14 23:46:51 |
| Subject: Re: pgsql: Disable excessive FP optimization by recent versions of gcc. |