Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2

From: Federico Di Gregorio <fog(at)dndg(dot)it>
To: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2
Date: 2011-12-14 16:17:23
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: psycopg
On 14/12/11 17:15, Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
> The only widespread use of a numeric value I've seen (including many
> official psycopg2 examples) is for autocommit=0, so when I've changed
> the values I've cared to keep that value stable only. For this reason,
> my preference between the solutions goes to 2 too (in the unlikely
> case READ UNC started meaning anything for Postgres we can
> differentiate it from 1).
> Are you making the patch or shall I do it myself? If you change the
> values, take care of this check too:
> <>.
> In particular, before releasing, let me run the test against all the
> supported PG versions: these branch are exhaustively checked.

I'll do that later today. Thanks for the note.


In response to

psycopg by date

Next:From: Marko KreenDate: 2011-12-14 19:28:58
Subject: Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2
Previous:From: Daniele VarrazzoDate: 2011-12-14 16:15:46
Subject: Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group