On 5.12.2011 00:06, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> writes:
>> On 4.12.2011 22:16, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Um ... why would you design it like that?
>> The backends are added to pg_stat_activity after the auth hook finishes,
>> which means possible race conditions (backends executed at about the
>> same time don't see each other in pg_stat_activity). So I use an
>> exclusive lock that's acquired before reading pg_stat_activity and
>> released after the pg_stat_activity is updated.
>> That's the only thing the library loaded using local_preload_libraries
>> does - it releases the lock.
> That's an unbelievably ugly, and dangerous, kluge. All you need is one
> backend not loading the second library (and remember,
> local_preload_libraries is user-settable) and you've just locked up the
> Why are you using pg_stat_activity for this anyway? Searching the
> ProcArray seems much safer ... see CountDBBackends for an example.
Thanks, reading ProcArray works fine, although the ProcArrayStruct is
private to procarray.c so I had to create a local copy. That sounds a
bit too fragile I guess - whenever it changes, the extension will break
without a warning.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2011-12-05 23:27:29|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64|
|Previous:||From: Marti Raudsepp||Date: 2011-12-05 23:05:42|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v3|