Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches
From:
Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
To:
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,
Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>,
PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches
Date:
2011-12-03 12:59:58
Message-ID:
4EDA1D4E.1070007@gmx.de (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2011-07-05 12:25:03 from Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
2011-07-05 18:15:25 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2011-07-06 12:56:20 from Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
2011-07-06 20:41:40 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2011-07-06 20:58:14 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2011-07-07 00:26:02 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2011-07-07 14:44:06 from Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
2011-07-07 22:35:57 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2011-07-08 09:38:38 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2011-07-10 19:46:33 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2011-07-12 14:29:39 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2011-07-31 01:25:58 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2011-08-10 13:03:40 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2011-08-10 13:21:33 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2011-08-10 13:26:22 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2011-08-10 13:25:24 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2011-08-10 13:28:35 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2011-09-28 19:53:04 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2011-11-29 15:01:49 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2011-11-29 21:32:01 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2011-12-01 00:06:52 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2011-12-01 07:50:14 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2011-12-03 12:59:58 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2011-12-04 17:44:49 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2011-12-09 20:40:03 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2011-12-10 17:58:34 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2011-12-10 18:11:25 from Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2011-12-27 00:54:24 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2011-12-28 04:09:15 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2011-12-28 06:55:44 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2011-12-28 13:38:54 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2011-12-28 13:43:19 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2011-12-28 14:08:22 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2011-12-28 14:11:24 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2011-12-28 22:44:25 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2011-12-31 23:10:26 from Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
2012-01-01 23:01:45 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2012-01-02 14:51:08 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2012-01-02 17:17:34 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2012-01-03 13:46:47 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2011-11-30 16:09:55 from Andrew Dunstan <adunstan(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I'd vote for whatever matches the "general perl pest practices" at
> this time.
I didn't kow the "perl pest practices" until now but as the PostgreSQL
community is more into C I think I know what you mean ;-)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2011-12-03 13:23:48Subject : Re: Command TriggersPrevious :From : Albe LaurenzDate : 2011-12-03 11:02:13Subject : Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
