Trying to restart this discussion, since the feature bogged down on
spec. We have consensus that we need to change how replication mode is
mangaged; surely we can reach consensus on how to change it?
On 11/8/11 11:39 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> configuration data somewhere else, but we really need to be able to tell
>> the difference between "starting PITR", "continuing PITR after a
>> mid-recovery crash", and "finished PITR, up and running normally".
>> A GUC is not a good way to do that.
> Does a GUC make sense to you for how to handle standby/master for
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2011-12-02 20:51:42|
|Subject: Re: WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2011-12-02 20:47:02|
|Subject: Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement|