Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>,<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation
Date: 2011-11-26 23:58:44
Message-ID: 4ED128D402000025000434FE@gw.wicourts.gov (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund  wrote:
 
> All current x86 cpus use 64bytes.
 
That matches what I found in recent research on the topic.
 
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-11-27 00:26:55
Subject: Re: GiST range-contained-by searches versus empty ranges
Previous:From: Andres FreundDate: 2011-11-26 23:51:06
Subject: Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group