From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: So where are we on the open commitfest? |
Date: | 2011-10-28 20:07:55 |
Message-ID: | 4EAB0B9B.3080103@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> * unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
>>
>> This one also seems to be lacking consensus more than anything else.
>> What do we do about that?
>
> AFAIR, the only person objecting is Simon. I'm not necessarily saying
> that means we should drive it in over his objections, but OTOH there
> were quite a few people who spoke in favor of it and we shouldn't
> ignore those voices either.
The problem is, it will break tools. I was one of the people that
supported Simon in his argument against. Not going to cause a huge stink
but it is something to consider.
JD
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-28 20:11:54 | Re: TOAST versus VACUUM, or "missing chunk number 0 for toast value" identified |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-10-28 20:01:22 | Re: So where are we on the open commitfest? |