Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?
Date: 2011-10-28 20:07:55
Message-ID: 4EAB0B9B.3080103@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> * unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
>>
>> This one also seems to be lacking consensus more than anything else.
>> What do we do about that?
>
> AFAIR, the only person objecting is Simon.  I'm not necessarily saying
> that means we should drive it in over his objections, but OTOH there
> were quite a few people who spoke in favor of it and we shouldn't
> ignore those voices either.

The problem is, it will break tools. I was one of the people that 
supported Simon in his argument against. Not going to cause a huge stink 
but it is something to consider.

JD

>


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-10-28 20:11:54
Subject: Re: TOAST versus VACUUM, or "missing chunk number 0 for toast value" identified
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-10-28 20:01:22
Subject: Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group