>> * unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
>> This one also seems to be lacking consensus more than anything else.
>> What do we do about that?
> AFAIR, the only person objecting is Simon. I'm not necessarily saying
> that means we should drive it in over his objections, but OTOH there
> were quite a few people who spoke in favor of it and we shouldn't
> ignore those voices either.
The problem is, it will break tools. I was one of the people that
supported Simon in his argument against. Not going to cause a huge stink
but it is something to consider.
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-10-28 20:11:54|
|Subject: Re: TOAST versus VACUUM, or "missing chunk number 0 for toast value" identified |
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-10-28 20:01:22|
|Subject: Re: So where are we on the open commitfest?|