Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG

From: Rémi Zara <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG
Date: 2010-02-24 17:14:45
Message-ID: 4EA8EB51-583C-4F34-B64F-88C367B2E921@mac.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Le 17 févr. 2010 à 12:18, Boszormenyi Zoltan a écrit :

> Is this buildfarm member for detecting bugs in the already
> obsolete NetBSD 5.0 BETA, or what? The final 5.0 and
> two bugfix releases are already out for a while. The owner
> of that particular machine should upgrade.

I upgraded pika to NetBSD 5.0.2, and the problem is still there.
There are some tests (in "core") which tests for NaN and Infinity, which pass. So either those tests are insufficient, or the code does something different there.
Anything you want me to try ?

Regards,

Rémi Zara

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-02-24 17:18:54 Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Previous Message Marko Kreen 2010-02-24 17:11:21 Re: Pika buildfarm member failure on pgcrypto/test sha2