Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG

From: Rémi Zara <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG
Date: 2010-02-24 17:14:45
Message-ID: 4EA8EB51-583C-4F34-B64F-88C367B2E921@mac.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Le 17 févr. 2010 à 12:18, Boszormenyi Zoltan a écrit :

> Is this buildfarm member for detecting bugs in the already
> obsolete NetBSD 5.0 BETA, or what? The final 5.0 and
> two bugfix releases are already out for a while. The owner
> of that particular machine should upgrade.

I upgraded pika to NetBSD 5.0.2, and the problem is still there.
There are some tests (in "core") which tests for NaN and Infinity, which pass. So either those tests are insufficient, or the code does something different there.
Anything you want me to try ?

Regards,

Rémi Zara

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-02-24 17:18:54
Subject: Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Previous:From: Marko KreenDate: 2010-02-24 17:11:21
Subject: Re: Pika buildfarm member failure on pgcrypto/test sha2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group