Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?

From: Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Date: 2011-09-19 21:20:17
Message-ID: 4E77B211.9050002@freedomcircle.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Greg,

On 09/19/2011 04:44 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> Not spending as much time sitting in meetings and fighting with other
> vendors is one of the competitive advantages PostgreSQL development has
> vs. the "big guys". There needs to be a pretty serious problem with
> your process before adding bureaucracy to it is anything but a backwards
> move. And standardization tends to attract lots of paperwork. Last
> thing you want to be competing with a big company on is doing that sort
> of big company work.

You have a point there. However, open source standardization doesn't
have to be patterned after closed source efforts. OTOH it's hard to
predict what form it should take. Perhaps it's simply a matter of
cross-pollination, i.e., the kind of interaction with MySQL groups that
occurred over the last year (I realize it wasn't just or even primarily
SQL-related).

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-09-19 21:47:19 Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2011-09-19 20:50:54 Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?