Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2

From: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2
Date: 2011-09-10 19:59:08
Message-ID: 4E6BC18C.3080105@squeakycode.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 09/10/2011 02:52 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2011-09-06 at 11:41 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> I think the alphas have been extremely valuable for testing.
>
> That's not my recollection.  Obviously, it's hard to measure this one
> way or the other, but I don't recall there being a lot of test reports
> from people who are not already contributors and could have used some
> other way to get the code.
>
>
As a tester, I'll pull from git.  I like a quick update from git pull.

When I'm playing with patches, its a simple:

git reset --hard
patch < ...

I can't speak for others, but I find no benefit from a packaged alpha release.

-Andy

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2011-09-10 20:07:09
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2
Previous:From: Joshua BerkusDate: 2011-09-10 19:57:40
Subject: Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group