Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_dump --exclude-table-data

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump --exclude-table-data
Date: 2011-09-02 18:25:08
Message-ID: 4E611F84.6080207@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/24/2011 05:01 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> For those who are (like my clients :-) ) anxious to get their hands on
>> this immediately, a backport patch is also attached which applies to 9.0
>> sources, and applies with offsets to 8.4 sources.
> FWIW, I have immediate use for this in creating cut-down versions of
> databases for testing purposes.  It'll eliminate a couple pages of shell
> scripts for me.
>

OK, this seems to have some pluses and no negative comments, so it seems 
worth going forward. Do we want an equivalent pg_restore option?

cheers

andrew


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-09-02 18:43:16
Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2011-09-02 18:15:34
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group