On 03.08.2011 13:05, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I don't believe that the standard allows for an implementation of
> enums as unsigned integers - after all, individual enum literals can
> be given corresponding negative integer values.
> Each enumerated type shall be compatible with char, a signed integer type, or an
> unsigned integer type. The choice of type is implementation-defined,110) but shall be
> capable of representing the values of all the members of the enumeration.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2011-08-03 11:13:20|
|Subject: Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings|
|Previous:||From: Sergey Konoplev||Date: 2011-08-03 10:35:43|
|Subject: Odd VACUUM behavior when it is expected to truncate last