On 07/06/2011 08:26 PM, Brar Piening wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Review of VS 2010 support patches
> From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
> To: Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
> Date: 06.07.2011 22:58
>>> I'll remove my versions from the patch (v9 probably) if those files
>>> get commited.
>> I'm just doing some final testing and preparing to commit the new
>> pgflex and pgbison.
> The attached patch includes documentation changes and excludes my
> versions of pgbison.pl and pgflex.pl which have been replaced by
> Andrews' versions that are already commited.
> As before "perltidy_before.patch" has to be applied first and
> "VS2010v9.patch" second.
I just started looking at this a bit. One small question: why are we
using "use base qw(foo);" instead of "use parent qw(foo);" which I
understand is preferred these days?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-07-31 01:46:05|
|Subject: Re: pgbench internal contention|
|Previous:||From: Dean Rasheed||Date: 2011-07-30 22:40:46|
|Subject: Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints|