Re: Planet posting policy

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy
Date: 2011-07-15 03:51:00
Message-ID: 4E1FB924.3000609@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 07/14/2011 07:29 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Can we not remember that as people in this community that actually
>> makes the post relevant to postgresql?
>
> I look forward to being able to direct a less filtered version of my
> blog into the Planet if PostgreSQL relevancy stops being a requirement.
> You all are going to love my weekly posts about new prog metal bands
> I've discovered.
>

Well I would. I can always chose to not read a post if I don't find it
interesting. It is that whole free will thing.

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-07-15 05:08:57 Re: Planet posting policy
Previous Message Brendan Jurd 2011-07-15 02:39:40 Re: Planet posting policy