| From: | Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: per-column generic option |
| Date: | 2011-07-12 12:25:36 |
| Message-ID: | 4E1C3D40.8070900@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2011/07/12 21:19), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:31 AM, Shigeru Hanada<shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I'm afraid that I've misunderstood the discussion. Do you mean that
>> per-table options should be stored in reloptions, but per-column should
>> be separated from attoptions? (I think I've misread...)
>
> No, I was arguing that they should both be separate.
Thanks, I'm relieved. :)
Regards,
--
Shigeru Hanada
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-12 12:26:59 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Enable CHECK constraints to be declared NOT VALID |
| Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2011-07-12 12:25:12 | Re: Patch Review: Bugfix for XPATH() if text or attribute nodes are selected |