Re: Small patch for GiST: move childoffnum to child

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Small patch for GiST: move childoffnum to child
Date: 2011-07-10 18:43:14
Message-ID: 4E19F2C2.9010001@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Teodor, Oleg, Heikki,

> My concern is that I am unable to prove to myself simply by reading
> the code that the 24 line chunk deleted from gistFindPath (near ***
> 919,947 ****) are no longer needed. My familiarity with the gist code
> is low enough that it is not surprising that I cannot prove this to
> myself from first principles. I have no reason to believe it is not
> correct, it is just that I can't convince myself that it is correct.

Can one of you weigh in on Jeff's concern here about this patch?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-07-10 18:44:28 Re: Re: patch review : Add ability to constrain backend temporary file space
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-07-10 18:40:54 Re: Patch Review: Bugfix for XPATH() if text or attribute nodes are selected