On 06/28/2011 04:45 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 15 June 2011 09:34, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:18, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 15 June 2011 05:47, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mar jun 14 19:47:30 -0400 2011:
>>>>> I notice that 9.1's features aren't included on the feature matrix.
>>>>> Last time the features for 9.0 were shown during its beta stage. Is
>>>>> this an oversight, it's not ready yet, or are we not adding it until
>>>>> the final release?
>>>> ... or is Stefan just too busy?
>>> It needn't all fall upon Stefan surely? I wouldn't mind looking into
>>> it if it isn't already being worked on.
>> No, it doesn't all need to fall upon Stefan. It's just that he's
>> usually been doing it, so I think people have just been backing off to
>> let him do it again :-) Stefan - clearly we have volunteers to help
>> out to do it if you don't want to/have the time. Just speak up :)
> We haven't heard anything further on this. Is it under development?
> We're approaching our 3rd beta in 2 weeks so would be nice to get
> something up soonish.
> Stefan, are you still okay to do this, or would you prefer others have
> a go at adding it this time?
congratulations - you just got signed up for the task ;) - access
information will be sent seperately. Note that the newly added versions
will not be visible unless one of the sysadmins flips another small
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2011-06-28 23:57:19|
|Subject: Problems with sending mail to this list|
|Previous:||From: Thom Brown||Date: 2011-06-28 14:45:26|
|Subject: Re: 9.1 feature matrix|