Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: generate_series() Interpretation

From: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: generate_series() Interpretation
Date: 2011-06-27 19:20:49
Message-ID: 4E08D811.7060201@pinpointresearch.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Yeah, which is why I said it was subject to interpretation. Of course there's no way to tell generate_series() which to use, which is what I figured.
>
Fortunately PostgreSQL uses the same interpretation for '1 month'  when 
used in generate_series that it does everywhere else - to do otherwise 
would be hella confusing. :)

Cheers,
Steve


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2011-06-27 19:31:36
Subject: Re: generate_series() Interpretation
Previous:From: Michael NolanDate: 2011-06-27 19:12:48
Subject: Re: generate_series() Interpretation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group